Remembering David Burwell – Sarah Campbell

Dear Friends,

On February 1, 2017 our community of transportation policy reform lost a long-time advocate, who coached many of us in understanding the difference between “convinced” and “convincing”. He was not only at the front of the successful rails to trails movement, but he was also one of the founders of the Surface Transportation Policy Project – now Partnership. In his spare time, he worked to bring understanding and conviction to climate policy.

David Burwell was not just a well-meaning intellectual. He was a clear-headed optimist, who by amazing focus (decades) created the transportation reform movement from the embers of citizen protest over interstate freeway construction that crushed urban neighborhoods and rural beauty alike.

As James Coreless (Transportation for America) says, David’s book [1] The End of the Road, put the problem into human perspective; it is a work that continues to inspire younger generations. I will skip over his incredible accomplishments on masterminding the Rails to Trails movement and focus on how I know him best in the larger role of broad transportation reform and the creation of STPP.

Like many in the transportation field, I met David Burwell because he showed up in my office. I was at US DOT during the Carter Administration, when I was privileged to work for Mort Downey, Asst. Secretary of Budget and Programs and Anne Canby, Deputy ASBP. It was heady times and David was looking for sympathetic ears among people who just might be able to do something. Most of you won’t know that the Carter Administration had a really progressive urban policy AND also had a focused delivery system for rural communities. But David knew. And he asked for help in preserving what most Americans hold dear instinctively about their heritage: community, history, clean environment, economic opportunity, and human-scale neighborhoods .

Let’s be clear – David was not a stick-in-mud, status quo kind of person and his extreme optimism encouraged (and prodded) us all to do better.

Eleven or so years later, after occasional shared discussion in urban issues, he showed up on my doorstep with one of many great ideas David was to promote over more than 40 years of advocacy. He and Jessica Tuchman Matthews – then on the Washington Post editorial board and, most recently, head of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace – had been working with others concerned about the environmental on how to successfully implement the new Amendments to the Clean Air Act. David had come to ask me to work with them and a growing group of non-profits and public interest associations (cities, MPOs, architects, planners, bicyclists, landscape architects, transit interests and certain urban states) on the reauthorization of the highway and transit legislation due for expiration in 1991. David and the group believed they needed someone who knew the transportation law and protocols, so I got the nod. Whatever they thought, it was essential that a brilliant and dedicated person such as David was clearly in the leadership.

It was wonderful to be part of what this group of 130 organizations accomplished from June 1990 until the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) was enacted in December 1991. I still see this broad-based collaboration as a landmark event in Federal policy, and I know just how much of this result is a credit to the spirit and life of David Burwell. We need him now more than ever.

David was one of the very distinguished alumni of Directors of the STPP that came after me: Grace Crunican, Hank Dittmar, Roy Kienitz, (David), Anne Canby, and Bill Wilkinson. All have made their positive marks in this world of transportation reform, and David remains in our hearts as an inspirational force for STPP’s work.

May God bless his spirit—- and we follow his example.

Sarah Campbell
Founding director and current board member of STPP

See the following for more information on David and his remarkable life:


“THE END OF THE ROAD – A Citizen’s Guide to Transportation Problemsolving”



href=”″>THE END OF THE ROAD – A Citizen’s Guide to Transportation Problemsolving, 1977

Co-authors: David G. Burwell and Mary Ann Wilner; Foreword By Senator Henry M.[Scoop] Jackson



The Alliance for Biking and Walking has collected and analyzed data on bicycling and walking in all 50 states, the 52 largest U.S. cities, and a select number of mid-sized cities to create its biennial Bicycling and Walking in the United States: 2016 Benchmarking Report ( The 2016 Report combines original research with over 20 government data sources to compile data on bicycling and walking levels and demographics, safety, funding, policies, infrastructure, education, public health indicators, and economic impacts.

Boston and Washington D.C., tied at the top of the 2016 Benchmarking Report for the share of commuters who bike or walk to work in the 50 most populous U.S. cities— 16.7 percent of both cities’ commuters bike or walk to work. That’s a 2 percent increase in D.C. since the 2014 report, with Boston’s rates unchanged in the same time period.


The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) in early September released the National Transit Map data, a geospatial database containing the information from 270 transit agencies that provides open, machine-readable data about their stops, routes, and schedules. This new U.S. DOT initiative will help pinpoint “transit deserts”—areas that lack sufficient services.

The national, openly available map of fixed-guideway and fixed-route transit service in America will allow the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to demonstrate the importance and role of transit in American society and to identify and address gaps in access to public transportation. It will also support research, planning and analysis on the benefits of transit, such as the economic impacts of transit on a community’s economic development, or on reducing poverty in low-income neighborhoods.



A recently published Transportation Research Record article describes findings and recommendations for how to minimize error for bicycle counting from tests by the Oregon DOT. This research studied three types of off-the-shelf pneumatic tube counters for counting bicycles, including equipment from five manufacturers: two bicycle-specific counters, three varieties of motor vehicle classification counters, and one volume-only motor vehicle counter. See:


Smart Growth America has released research, ”Foot Traffic Ahead 2016″ (, looking at walkable urban development in the nation’s largest metro areas. The report examined 619 regionally significant walkable urban places—or WalkUPs—in the country’s 30 largest metro areas. It ranks these areas based on the amount of commercial and multi-family rental development in WalkUPs, and uses a series of social equity metrics such as housing costs, transportation costs, and access to jobs to understand the relationship between walkability and social equity. The report ranks which metros are making the most of their current development, which are positioned to be most walkable in the future, and which rank best for social equity. Check it out at: